U.S. Climate Report Warns of Damaged Environment and Shrinking Economy- NY TIMES

The updates on climate change continue to paint a dark picture. Despite past policy changes, progress does not appear effective. Industries were disrupted, employees destined to longterm unemployment, but still climate change still continues.

There really needs to be a better approach to fighting the effects of carbon. Proactively capture and storing carbon might be an effective way of mitigating climate change and somewhat protecting our economic progress. Being able to directly eliminate externalities with production will create the needed balance.

Producers need to continuously implement green manufacturing processes. Consumers need to continue to prefer cleaner goods and services. Instead of leveraging climate change for political purposes, instead use free markets and private sector solutions to solve climate change.



Study Cites the Benefits of Taking Student Loans – The Wall Street Journal.

Not surprising that people who invest in themselves and their own future will be more focused and efficient when navigating their way towards a college degree.

While not having the trust fund or full ride can be challenging after the fact, students that pay their way find ways to avoid unnecessary charges, like non-essential classes and bloated meal plans, and focus on the GPAs, which can help their ability to attract higher paying employment to pay down the loans. All while providing them life lessons that will help them in their future.

The push for free college will undoubtedly make colleges perform like high schools, as the personal investment will not be there to motivate student performance. Over time, student drop outs will increase, as many high schools ill-prepare students for completing a college curriculum. Progressives will then push for policies that force colleges to graduate students, even though they lack the needed competencies.

The goal should be to incentivize colleges and universities to operate efficiently and pass savings to students, not passing the cost to the taxpayers. Students should truly only pay for the cost of education and services attained. Other activities and projects should be funded through donations, fundraisers, public grants, and other channels.


AT&T and Verizon Pursue Different Paths Into the Future (WSJ)

One is focusing on acquiring content, while the other seeks to acquire new customer groups. Reminiscent of Coke vs Pepsi, where Coke focuses on being a leader in beverages, while Pepsi aims to diversify in food and beverage.

ATT aims to attract individual consumers, which are content driven and value entertainment. By owning content providers, ATT will not only expand revenue streams, but can create exclusive customer experiences for ATT wireless consumers.

On the other hand, Verizon strives to invest in technology and expanding its industry consumer base, which is more stable than personal consumers. Industry consumers prefer service contracts, which provide cost stability and detailed service guarantees. This could provide Verizon stable revenue streams over longer periods.

ATT will have to manage divergent business unit and balance varying goals and industry norms. Conversely, Verizon will be able to focus on its core competency and strengthen consumer quality in multiple segments.

Both have viable paths forward. Interesting to see how smaller competitors adjust.


Sears, a Onetime Retail Giant, Reshaped America – The Wall Street Journal.

At least some of the past or present Sears execs understood the problem. Sears cut costs improperly and diid not invests enough in the stores. Compared to other department stores, the customer experience was lacking at Sears.

Sears does have the potential for a future. But, it will need to consider what that future will look like. In Nearing the End, I give a plausible suggestion.


Sears Prepares for Bankruptcy Filing as Debt Payment Looms – The Wall Street Journal.

The iconic once retail giant may be nearing its final stretch. Or maybe it can dwarf into a profitable condense form of itself. If the latter, it will need to find a way to develop and connect with a new target market not already retired.

At one point Sears dominated the retail landscape, largely because it was the first general retailer to market offerings for the entire family and the one willing to stand by its products. As the market change with new players, Sears never effectively captured a new market group.

If Sears does survive, it needs to have a narrower focus. One approach could be deconstruction of their retail concept by creating two distinct chains. One could be a clothing targeting people that may not be served by more trendy stores or a channel for professionals looking for everyday affordable clothes. Another would be an autonomous Sears Auto not tied to a store.

At this point, the Sears leadership team is probably focused on seeing how many tomorrows it has left. If there some, they need to consider what those days will look like.



The United States is a nation built on the ideals of self reliance, self-determination, ambition, and hard-work. Americans admire self made success, which all seek to emulate in some manner. Americans value the pride of labor, achievement, creativity, and innovation.

A nation built on the governance principles of being of the people, for the people, and by the people should have an economy owned and operated by the people. No economic system captures the productivity, innovation, and energy of private citizens like free market capitalism. No other system lifts people out of poverty while expanding national wealth at the same time.

In the above content, the benefits of free market capitalism and flaws of socialism are covered. While changing economic models is a radical idea, policymakers implementing minor tweaks is appropriate to expand opportunity where needed.

Please visit the CRC Review by clicking the link above.




China Is Losing the Trade War With Trump

SOURCE: The Wall Street Journal (OPINION)

China Is Losing the Trade War With Trump

Interesting take on trade wars, as standing up to trade manipulators takes resolve and determination. Since the Trump Economic Expansion should buffer much of the potential negatives, it is importance to continue pressing the Chinese to reconsider practices that harm their partners.


Where is Braves legend Dale Murphy now?


This is a surprisingly good article in the current era of ESPN. It raises a big moral dilemma our society has. Do we value good people as much as we detest bad people?

In sports, this phenomenon is obvious, as demonstrated in the article. Sports writers demonize PED users as villains while casting doubt on other players with upstanding reputations. The idea that the person did not get caught yet.

Do we simply believe that good people do not exist? Do we not value good behavior? While no one is completely perfect, there are many people overlooked because being a good person is not properly valued.

Consider how much better our communities and overall society would be if we valued good behaviors. Instead of normalizing immorality and violence. Could be a gamechanger.


For many service based businesses, technology can improve access to customers and the customer experience. For both fast food and quick service restaurants, technology like Uber Eats, Seamless, and others can help a great deal in expanding the earnings for franchise owners. What is more convenient than ordering a meal with a couple clicks on a smartphone. For people averse to small talk, waiting in line, and interactions with the everyday person, this is essential.

The convenience and benefits of technology has its downsides as well. For instance, the satisfaction the customer receives for using the service only is positive if the order is delivered timely and correct. Personal experience shows that Uber Eats can be somewhat hit or miss with accuracy with simple orders to everyday restaurants. In fairness, the issue may be the provider or the delivery person. The customer will never truly know. But, people always hold the entity with the deeper pockets more accountable.

Another aspect is more operational, considering service to both online and in-person orders. In the span of a couple days, I had the opportunity to see two different restaurants, one a national chain and the other a regional one, struggle with the same problem. For both, the service line processed orders for both channels, which created a backlog of in-person customers waiting to be acknowledged let alone served. After every order, the cashier had to politely apologize for the delay, hoping to reduce the likelihood the customer would choose not to come back.

Many business are quick to pursuit new revenue stream before vetting and implementing the needed operational changes to accommodate changes. For order accuracy, the implementation of an order check at pickup by either provider or delivery person could reduce order errors. In service, restaurants may want to consider separating lines during rush periods to improve the in-store experience. Simple changes that could reduce occurrences of negative customer reactions.